|
IS SOMEONE TRYING TO ETHICALLY OR UNETHICALLY INFLUENCE YOU?
CHECK OUT THE INFLUENCE CONTINUUM
The following Influence Continuum shows you the method and
modes of various influence techniques (on the left) as a vertical continuum. On the right you will find the various descending
techniques for that section.
At the top of the Influence Continuum you will find choice respecting tactics that are
educative and therapeutic and have their emphasis on the message. In the middle you will find compliance gaining techniques
that are persuasive and manipulative and have their emphasis on gaining a response.
At the
bottom of the continuum you will find destructive controlling techniques designed to isolate you from normal social supports
and reality testing. As your review the continuum try to remember people or organizations (friends, bosses, teachers,
family, corporate tactics, etc.) you liked and disliked that have been applied to you fromthe various sections of the influence continuum. This is a powerful
quick tool to help you choose how you are influenced and to identify unethical or illegal types of personal, corporate or
governmental influence to which you have been subjected.
| Method Of Influence |
Techniques |
|
|
| Mode of Influence: Choice-respecting (emphasis
on message) |
|
| Educative/Therapeutic: |
Reflection
Clarification
Discussion
Information Giving
Directed
Questioning
Creative Expression
Advisory/Therapeutic
Commenting on Problem or alternatives
Suggesting Ideas
Recommending
solutions
Rational argument (message oriented)
Hypnosis (some forms) |
|
|
| Mode of Influence: Compliance-Gaining (emphasis
on response) |
|
| Persuasive/Manipulative Rational Argument: |
compliance oriented
Emotional appeals
Compliance tactics: consistency,
reciprocation, social proof, authority, liking, scarcity (see Cialdini. 1985)
Hypnosis (some forms) |
| Controlling/Destructive Isolation from social supports: |
Selective reward/punishment
Denigration of self and of critical
thinking
Dissociative states to suppress doubt and critical thinking
Alternation of harshness/threats and leniency/love
Control-oriented
guilt induction
Active promotion of dependency
Debilitation
Physical restraint/punishment
Pressured public confessions |
Operation Amalgam Virgo
Rumsfeld On Dyncorp Sex Rings, Missing Pentagon Trillions & 9/11 Wargames
|
| W199I |
| Both images taken at 9:03 a.m. |
|
| knowing full well the US is already under attack. |
WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767
|
| Is Al Qaeda Just a Bush Boogeyman? |
The 9/11 WTC Collapses: An Audio-Video Analysis
|
| "PULL IT" |
NO PLANE
Other Fires in Steel-Structure Buildings
The collapse of the WTC
by Kevin Ryan
Underwriters Laboratories
Thursday, Nov 11,
2004 The following letter was sent today by Kevin Ryan of Underwriters
Laboratories to Frank Gayle of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Underwriters Laboratories is the
company that certified the steel components used in the construction of the World
Trade Center towers. The information in this letter is of
great importance.Dr. Gayle,Having recently reviewed
your team's report of 10/19/04, I felt the need to contact you directly.As I'm sure you
know, the company I work for certified the steel components used in the construction of the WTC buildings. In requesting information
from both our CEO and Fire Protection business manager last year, I learned that they did not agree on the essential aspects
of the story, except for one thing - that the samples we certified met all requirements. They suggested we all be patient
and understand that UL was working with your team, and that tests would continue through this year. I'm aware of UL's attempts
to help, including performing tests on models of the floor assemblies. But the results of these tests appear to indicate
that the buildings should have easily withstood the thermal stress caused by pools of burning jet fuel.There continues to be a number of "experts" making public claims about how the WTC buildings fell. One such
person, Dr. Hyman Brown from the WTC construction crew, claims that the buildings collapsed due to fires at 2000F melting
the steel (1). He states "What caused the building to collapse is the airplane fuel…burning at 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit.
The steel in that five-floor area melts." Additionally, the newspaper that quotes him says "Just-released preliminary findings
from a National Institute of Standards and Technology study of the World
Trade Center
collapse support Brown’s theory."We know that the
steel components were certified to ASTM E119. The time temperature curves for this standard require the samples to be exposed
to temperatures around 2000F for several hours. And as we all agree, the steel applied met those specifications. Additionally,
I think we can all agree that even un-fireproofed steel will not melt until reaching red-hot temperatures of nearly 3000F
(2). Why Dr. Brown would imply that 2000F would melt the high-grade steel used in those buildings makes no sense at all.The results of your recently published metallurgical tests seem to clear things up (3), and support your team's
August 2003 update as detailed by the Associated Press (4), in which you were ready to "rule out weak steel as a contributing
factor in the collapse." The evaluation of paint deformation and spheroidization seem very straightforward, and you noted
that the samples available were adequate for the investigation. Your comments suggest that the steel was probably exposed
to temperatures of only about 500F (250C), which is what one might expect from a thermodynamic analysis of the situation.However the summary of the new NIST report seems to ignore your findings, as it suggests that these low temperatures
caused exposed bits of the building’s steel core to "soften and buckle." (5) Additionally this summary states that the
perimeter columns softened, yet your findings make clear that "most perimeter panels (157 of 160) saw no temperature above
250C." To soften steel for the purposes of forging, normally temperatures need to be above1100C (6). However, this new summary
report suggests that much lower temperatures were be able to not only soften the steel in a matter of minutes, but lead to
rapid structural collapse.This story just does not add up. If steel from those buildings
did soften or melt, I’m sure we can all agree that this was certainly not due to jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone
the briefly burning fires in those towers. That fact should be of great concern to all Americans. Alternatively, the contention
that this steel did fail at temperatures around 250C suggests that the majority of deaths on 9/11 were due to a safety-related
failure. That suggestion should be of great concern to my company.There is no question
that the events of 9/11 are the emotional driving force behind the War on Terror. And the issue of the WTC collapse is at
the crux of the story of 9/11. My feeling is that your metallurgical tests are at the crux of the crux of the crux. Either
you can make sense of what really happened to those buildings, and communicate this quickly, or we all face the same destruction
and despair that come from global decisions based on disinformation and “chatter”.Thanks
for your efforts to determine what happened on that day. You may know that there are a number of other current and former
government employees that have risked a great deal to help us to know the truth. I've copied one of these people on this message
as a sign of respect and support. I believe your work could also be a nucleus of fact around which the truth, and thereby
global peace and justice, can grow again. Please do what you can to quickly eliminate the confusion regarding the ability
of jet fuel fires to soften or melt structural steel.
WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767
GOVERNMENT PLOT
Judge refuses request for FBI records on 1996 Flight 800 crash
Peace Groups Continue To Miss The Real Issue
Television Programming is a correct statement. You are being programmed.
You pay people billions of $ each year to think for you and reprogram your mind with repetion of messages
sponsered by
a Non-representative Government(orchestrated by the wealthy elite) and Corporate america. The programming such as News(not
reality or necessarily true),Movies(Sex,Violence, Control themes),Sports(predetermined outcomes) Gambling & Music Recording
industry brought to you by industries of organized crime since the methods of distribution were invented. Repetition whether
true or false good or bad changes the way you think. Television has become the unofficial mind-control branch of the government
and a money making outlet for corporate america. Politics have been reduced to greed and control for those that have wealth
to stay wealthy.
|
| Control Through Television |
Fair and Balanced Inauguration
|
| Bushism |
STAY SCRIPTED
All the News That's Fit to Fake
AN ANCIENT TRADITION
Many students willing to give government control of press
MIND CONTROL
GLADIO
|
|
The topic of mind control is elaborate, multifaceted, and multi layered. For the casual reader, it can quickly
become numbing, overwhelming the senses and creating a desire to exit the topic, but avoiding this subject is the most foolish
thing you could possibly do since your only chance of surviving this hideous and insidious enslavement agenda, which today
threatens virtually all of humanity, is to understand how it functions and take steps to reduce
your vulnerability.
For many Americans, the 1950s were a docile decade. In U.S. history books, the period is mostly portrayed as a mellow,
orderly one, especially in light of the social upheavals that followed in the 1960s. But for the CIA, the "I Like Ike" years
were packed with adventure and action, much of it conducted outside of the public's view. Few programs were sheltered with
more secrecy than the Agency's mind control experiments, identified together with the code-name MKULTRA.
The most notorious MKULTRA experiments were the CIA's pioneering studies of the drug that would years later feed the
heads of millions: lysergic acid diethylamide, or LSD. The CIA was intrigued by the drug, and harbored hopes that acid or
a similar drug could be used to clandestinely disorient and manipulate target foreign leaders. (The Agency would consider
several such schemes in its pursuit of Cuban leader Fidel Castro, who they wanted to send into a drug-induced stupor or tirade
during a public or live radio speech.) LSD was also viewed as a way to loosen tongues in CIA interrogations.
MIND CONTROL DOCUMENTARY
Operation Hollywood
911 Video Preview Clips:
|
